| NavigationINDEX |
P2 Purinoceptors
The information on this page
was excerpted from:
- van Rhee, A.M.; Fischer, B.; Jacobson, K.A.
Modelling the P2Y purinoceptor using rhodopsin as template.
Drug Design & Discovery, 1995, 13: 133-154.
for a complete report, and more details, please use this publication as a
reference.
General Introduction
The P2Y1 purinoceptor cloned from chick brain (Webb, T. et al (1993)
FEBS Lett., 324, 219-225) is a 362 amino acid, 41 kDa protein. To locate
residues tentatively involved in ligand recognition a molecular model of the
P2Y1 purinoceptor was constructed. The model was based on the
primary sequence and structural homology with the G protein-coupled
photoreceptor rhodopsin, in analogy to the method proposed by Ballesteros and
Weinstein ((1995) Meth. Neurosci. 25, 366-428).
New and Selective Ligands
The complete elucidation of P2 subtypes and mechanisms of action
have been impeded by the limited number of stable and selective agonists and
antagonists available. We have recently reported the synthesis of a variety of
ATP analogues modified at either the ribose or the purine, including a series
of functionalized congeners based on the potent P2Y purinoceptor
agonist
2-methylthioadenosine 5'-triphosphate
(2MeSATP).
14,
15
The 2-thio-ether derivatives were shown to be potent P2Y
purinergic ligands stimulating the production of inositol phosphates in turkey
erythrocyte membranes with K0.5-values ranging from 1.5 to 770 nM.
Moreover, N6-methyl-2-(5-hexenylthio)-ATP was shown to be a potent
and selective P2Y agonist (K0.5 = 26 ± 7 nM). Since
substitution at the N6 position of the adenine moiety seemed to
convey selectivity for a specific P2Y receptor
subtype,
14,
15
we now synthesized the 5'-mono- and triphosphates of
N6,N6-dimethyl-adenosine and
N6-(2-phenylethyl)-adenosine. Progress in the development of
antagonists has also been made recently.
16,
17,
18
Sequence Analysis
The dendrogram above, composed for the sequences of
29 G protein-coupled receptors (including orphan receptors) and
bacteriorhodopsin shows that the known metabotropic P2 receptor
sequences (P2Y and P2U) are more closely related to
each other than to any other receptor. Comparison of the P2Y (chick)
and P2U (rat) receptor subtypes with other GPCR sequences showed
only low percentages of sequence identity (e.g., angiotensin II -
P2Y 27 %, angiotensin II - P2U 22 %, thrombin -
P2Y 25 %, thrombin - P2U 25 %; interleukin 8 -
P2Y 22 %; interleukin 8 - P2U 23 %).
The P2 receptors,
regardless of subtype, whether GPCR or ligand-gated ion channel, are often
regarded as related to the better characterized and more widely known adenosine
receptors [Burnstock
4
and most subsequent reviews]. From the dendrogram, however, it must be
concluded that, e.g., the A2A adenosine receptor is more
closely related to the biogenic amine receptors, than to any of the GPCR
P2 receptors. Both P2Y and P2U receptors
bear only a marginal sequence identity with the A1 adenosine
receptor (21 % for P2Y and less than 12 % for P2U
receptor). P2 receptors are more closely related to the PAF,
AT1A, and IL-8A receptors, and various orphan receptors, than
to any other GPCR subfamily.
A comparison of P2Y vs.
P2U receptors revealed 38.8 % identity and 58.6 % similarity.
In the transmembrane regions the identity percentage was even higher - 52 %.
Bacteriorhodopsin, included to facilitate comparison with other modelling
studies,
[e.g.,
27,
35]
is clearly not related to any of the GPCR
subfamilies. The degree of relatedness between bacteriorhodopsin and GPCRs
shown in the dendrogram is probably an overestimate of the actual distance,
caused by the residue alignment procedure of the program.
Several residues that have been shown to be critical in ligand binding in
other GPCRs are
conserved
in the P2Y1 purinoceptor.
Receptor Model
Potential binding sites for agonists have been explored by docking several
derivatives (including newly synthesized N6-derivatives) into the
model. The N6-phenylethyl substituent is tolerated
pharmacologically, and in our model this substituent occupies a region
predominantly defined by aromatic residues such as F51 (TM1), Y100 (TM2) and
F120 (TM3). The dimethylated analogue of ATP,
N6,N6-dimethyl-adenosine 5'-triphosphate, is less well
tolerated pharmacologically, and our model predicts that the attenuated activity
is due to interference with hydrogen bonding capacity to Q296 (TM7).
The also model suggests four basic residues (H121 in TM3, H266 and K269 in
TM6 and R299 in TM7) near the extracellular surface that might be involved in
ligand binding. These basic residues might be essential in coordinating the
triphosphate chain of the endogenous ligand adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP).

Figure 2: Transmembrane domain 5 thru 7, with ATP bound.
Figure 2 is an cut-away drawing of TMs 5-7, shown to contain multiple ligand
binding residues in the
A2A receptor.
51
The binding of the endogenous ligand ATP seems to occur
around the upper third to upper half of the helical bundle.
ATP is oriented in the plane of the lipid bilayer, almost perpendicular to
the TMs. Figure 2 also demonstrates the use of
"membrane anchors"
near the bottom of TM5 and TM7, and the top of TM6.

Figure 3A: The phosphate binding domain in the P2Y1 purinoceptor.
Figures 3A and 3B focus on the ligand binding domain (BD) formed by TMs 5-7.
It appears that the binding of the triphosphate moiety is a major determinant
in binding of ligands to the P2Y1 purinergic receptor. Since this
part of the molecule contains multiple negative charges, one would expect to
find counterions in the BD.
Indeed, the P2Y1 receptor sequence
contains several positively charged residues. Our modelling study reveals that,
of these, Lys269 (TM6) and Arg299 (TM7) are likely candidates for this
function and are appropriately positioned within the helical bundle to execute
this function.
We propose that these two basic residues are assisted by two
histidine residues, His121 (TM3) and His266 (TM6), and one tyrosine residue,
Tyr125 (TM3)(Figure 3A). These residues tentatively coordinate the
alpha-phosphate (His121 and R299), the beta-phosphate (Y125, K269 and R299),
and the gamma-phosphate (His266, and K269).
Although adenosine 5'-monophosphate
analogues are widely regarded as inactive at P2 purinergic receptors,
2,
5,
6
Fischer et al
14
recently demonstrated that one monophosphate analogue in particular,
2-(5-hexenyl)thio-adenosine 5'-monophosphate, is a more potent
(K0.5 = 328 ± 43 nM; 8.5-fold over ATP) agonist at
P2Y receptors on turkey erythrocytes than ATP
(K0.5 = 2800 ± 700 nM).
In our model there is sufficient
coordination of the alpha-phosphate to warrant such an interaction, although
the number of stabilizing interactions, and hence the interaction energy and
affinity, will be lower than in the case of the corresponding triphosphate.
This is pointedly illustrated by the K0.5 values
of 2-(5-hexenylthio)-ATP (10 ± 4 nM) and 2-(5-hexenylthio)-AMP
(328 ± 43 nM).14 Since the interaction between
the receptor and a ligand monophosphate is much weaker than with a
triphosphate, the effect of substituents at distal sites, such as in
N6PEAMP (no effect at 10-4 M)
and N6diMeAMP (no effect at 10-4 M), increases and the
combined effect of deleting two phosphates and adding
N6-substituents proved detrimental to activity.
Although not directly involved in ligand binding, Pro218 in TM5 and Pro264 in
TM6 have a great impact on receptor structure, and therefore, the BD.
They are both located at the same distance from the membrane surface as the
ligand and, more importantly, Phe215 and Phe219 (Figure 3A, far right),
located at opposite sides of the discontinuity formed by Pro218, are in close
proximity of the terminal phosphate of ATP. This particular geometry is highly
suggestive of the much heralded, but as yet unproven conformational change
mechanism induced by agonists.

Figure 3B: The nucleoside binding domain in the P2Y1 purinoceptor.
Interestingly, Erb et al
41
showed that Lys289 (TM7) in the mouse P2U receptor,
corresponding to Gln296 (TM7)(Figure 3B, top left) in the chick P2Y
receptor, when mutated to an arginine, reversed the selectivity of the
triphosphates ATP and UTP to the corresponding diphosphates. In our proposed
model Gln296 (TM7) is not in the vicinity of the phosphate BD, and this
suggests that P2Y and P2U receptors display
significantly different modes of binding of ligands, as already implied by
the pharmacology-derived nomenclature of the receptors.
Two other residues were tentatively involved in coordinating the ribose moiety.
The side chain of Ser303 (TM7)(Figure 3B, left center) and the O2' are
separated by only 3.03 Å. The side chain of Ser306 (TM7)(Figure 3B,
bottom center) is within hydrogen bonding distance of O2' at 2.95
Å and O3' at 2.84 Å.
Ligand Docking
Ligand docking was initially performed with ATP, using a typical conformation
based on crystallographic data for protein-bound nucleotides. To avoid the
characteristically curled conformation of the triphosphate chain found in
several phosphate transferases (The structure in Figure 4 without explicit
hydrogens), we opted to use the nucleotide bound to the phosphate hydrolase
transducin (The structure in Figure 4 with explicit
hydrogens),
38
even though it involved substituting the purine guanine with the purine
adenine.

Figure 4A: Comparison of nucleotides bound to phosphate transferases or
phosphate hydrolases.
(Alignment of the adenine moieties.)
The effect of the conformation of the triphosphate, becomes even more clear
when the triphosphate moieties are aligned (Figure 4B), rather than the
adenine moieties (Figure 4A).

Figure 4B: Comparison of nucleotides bound to phosphate transferases or
phosphate hydrolases.
(Alignment of the triphosphate moieties.)
The orientation of the adenine
moiety relative to the ribose ring was anti (i.e., the dihedral angle
C9-N9-C1'-O4' was 30.18°). The ring puckering, defined by the dihedral
angle C1'-C2'-C3'-C4', was -3.85°, resulting in a 2'-exo, 3'-endo
conformation for the two hydroxyl groups.
Evaluation
We have sought to identify positively charged amino acid residues (Arg or Lys)
as anchoring points which could contribute major electrostatic interactions
with the phosphates of ATP. Such residues should be conserved within the
P2 GPCR family and should also be pointing towards the center of
the receptor cavity. Likewise, they should probably be located around the
middle or upper third of the transmembrane regions, where most of the
non-peptide GPCRs are thought to bind ligands. These requirements only yield
two possible anchoring points: Lys269 in TM6 and Arg299 in TM7.
In addition,
His250
in the A2A receptor
51
and
His265
in the NK1 receptor,
50
[the equivalents of His266 (TM6) in the P2Y receptor and His262 in
the P2U receptor] were both shown to be important for
ligand binding. The same holds true for
Arg265
(P2U),
Asn253
(A2A) and
Phe268
(NK1) [the equivalents of Lys269 (TM6)],
Lys289
(P2U) and
Tyr271
(A2A) [the equivalents of Gln296 (TM7)],
Arg292
(P2U) and
Ile274
(A2A) [the equivalents of Arg299 (TM7)],
His278
(A2A) corresponding to Ser303 (TM7), and
Ser281
(A2A) corresponding to Ser306 (TM7).
In contrast, Lys114 (TM3) in the P2Y and
Lys107
(TM3) in the P2U receptor were not implicated in ligand
binding
41
, whereas mutation of the equivalent residue,
Asp99,
in the rat m1 receptor resulted in loss of affinity.
49
This residue is located at the fringe of the transmembrane domain or
even in the first extracellular loop in our model. It is therefore likely
that the residue is involved in accessibility of the ligand binding domain
or in maintaining a specific structure in the loop.
Thus, we identified at least eight residues, Gln296 (TM7) in
the adenine binding domain,
Ser303 and Ser306 (both TM7) in the ribose binding domain,
His121 and Tyr125 (TM3), His266 and Lys269 (TM6),
and Arg299 (TM7) in the triphosphate binding domain,
that are involved in ligand binding according to this model.
Furthermore, we have shown that our model is consistent with the current
pharmacological data.
REFERENCES.
1. Hoyle, C.H.V. and Burnstock, G. (1991)
ATP receptors and their physiological roles. In
Adenosine in the nervous system.
Stone, T.W., Ed., pp. 43-76. London: Academic Press Ltd.
2. Hoyle, C.H.V. (1992)
Transmission: purines. In
Autonomic neuroeffector mechanisms.
Burnstock, G. and Hoyle, C.H.V., Eds., pp. 367-407.
Chur: Harwood Academic Press.
3. Edwards, F.A., Gibb, A.J., Colquhoun, D. (1992)
ATP receptor mediated synaptic currents in the central nervous system.
Nature 359, 144-147.
4. Burnstock, G. (1978)
A basis for distinguishing two types of purinergic receptor. In
Cell Membrane Receptors for Drugs and Hormones: a Multidisciplinary
Approach.
Straub, P.W. and Bolis, L., Eds., pp. 106-118. New York: Raven Press.
5. Cusack, N.J. (1993)
P2 receptors: subclassification and structure-activity relationships.
Drug Devel. Res. 28, 244-252.
6. Gordon, J.L. (1986)
Extracellular ATP: effects, sources and fate.
J. Biochem. 233, 309-319.
7. Fredholm, B.B., Abbracchio, M.P., Burnstock, G., Daly, J.W.,
Harden, T.K., Jacobson, K.A., Leff, P., Williams, M. (1994)
Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors.
Pharmacol. Rev. 46, 143-156.
8. Abbracchio, M.P., Burnstock, G. (1994)
Purinoceptors: are there families of P2X and P2Y purinoceptors?
Pharmac. Ther. 64, 445-475.
9. Dubyak, G.R. (1991)
Signal transduction by P2-purinergic receptors for extracellular ATP.
Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 4, 295-300.
10. Harden, T.K., Hawkins, P.T., Stephens, L., Boyer, J.L.,
Downes, P. (1988)
Phosphoinositide hydrolysis by guanosine 5'-([gamma-thio]triphosphate)-activated
phospholipase C of turkey erythrocyte membranes.
Biochem. J. 252, 583-593.
11. Pirotton, S., Boeynaems, J.M. (1991)
Transduction mechanism of P2 purinergic receptors:
Role of phospholipase C and calcium.
Nucleos. Nucleot. 10, 1009-1017.
12. Benham, C.D., Tsien, R.W. (1987)
A novel receptor-operated Ca2+-permeable channel
activated by ATP in smooth muscle.
Nature 328, 275-278.
13. Bean, B.P. (1992)
Pharmacology and electrophysiology of ATP activated ion channels.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 87-90.
14. Fischer, B., Boyer, J.L., Hoyle, C.H.V., Ziganshin, A.U.,
Brizzolara, A.L., Knight, G.E., Zimmet, J., Burnstock, G., Harden, T.K.,
Jacobson, K.A. (1994)
Identification of potent, selective P2Y-purinoceptor agonist
structure-activity relationship for 2-thioether derivatives of adenosine
5'-triphosphate.
J. Med. Chem. 36, 3937-3946.
15. Burnstock, G., Fischer, B., Hoyle, C.H.V., Maillard, M.,
Ziganshin, A.U., Brizzolara, A.L., von Isakovics, A., Boyer, J.L.,
Harden, T.K., Jacobson, K.A. (1994)
Structure activity relationship for derivatives of adenosine 5'-triphosphate
as agonists at P2 purinoceptors: heterogeneity within P2X and P2Y
subtypes.
Drug Devel. Res. 31, 206-219.
16. Windscheif, U., Ralevic, V., Bäumert, H.G., Mutschler, E.,
Lambrecht, G., Burnstock, G. (1994)
Vasoconstrictor and vasodilator responses to various agonists in the rat
perfused mesenteric arterial bed - Selective-inhibition by PPADS of
contractions mediated via P2X-purinoceptors.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 113, 1015-1021.
17. Humphries, R.G., Tomlinson, W., Ingall, A.H., Cage, P.A.,
Leff, P. (1994)
FPL-66096 - A novel, highly potent and selective antagonist at human platelet
P2T-purinoceptors.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 113, 1057-1063.
18. van Rhee, A.M., van der Heijden, M.P.A., Beukers, M.W., IJzerman, A.P.,
Soudijn, W., Nickel, P. (1994)
Novel competitive antagonists for P2 purinoceptors.
Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 268, 1-7.
19. Kyte, J., Doolittle, R.F. (1982)
A simple method for displaying the hydrophobic character of a protein.
J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132.
20. Kubo, T., Fukuda, K., Mikama, A., Maeda, A., Takahashi, H.,
Mishina, M., Haga, Y., Ichiyama, A., Kangawa, K., Kajima, M., Matsuo, H.,
Hirose, T., Numa, T. (1986)
Cloning, sequencing and expressing of complementary DNA coding the muscarinic
acetylcholine receptor.
Nature 323, 411-416.
21. Webb, T.E., Simon, J., Krishek, B.J., Bateson, A.N., Smart, T.G.,
King, B.F., Burnstock, G., Barnard, E.A. (1993)
Cloning and functional expression of a brain G-protein-coupled ATP receptor.
FEBS Lett. 324, 219-225.
22. Filtz, T.M., Li, Q., Boyer, J.L., Nicholas, R.A., Harden, T.K.
(1994)
Expression of a P2Y purinergic receptor that couples to
phospholipase C.
Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8-14.
23. Lustig, K.D., Shiau, A.K., Brake, A.J., Julius, D. (1993)
Expression cloning of an ATP receptor from mouse neuroblastoma cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5113-5117.
24. Parr, C.E., Sullivan, D.M., Paradiso, A.M., Lazarowski, E.R.,
Burch, L.H., Olsen, J.C., Erb, L., Weisman, G.A., Boucher, R.C.,
Turner, J.T. (1994)
Cloning and expression of a human P2U nucleotide receptor, a target
for cystic fibrosis pharmacotherapy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 3275-3279.
25. Rice, W.R., Burton, F.M., Fiedeldey, D.T. (1995)
Cloning and expression of the alveolar type II cell P2U-purinergic
receptor.
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 12, 27-32.
26. Jacobson, K.A., Stiles, G.L., Ji, X.D. (1992)
Chemical modification and irreversible inhibition of striatal A2a
adenosine receptors.
Mol. Pharmacol. 42, 123-133.
27. Hibert, M.F., Trumpp-Kallmeyer, S., Bruinvels, A., Hoflack, J.
(1991)
Three-dimensional models of neurotransmitter G-binding protein-coupled
receptors.
Mol. Pharmacol. 40, 8-15.
28. Schertler, G.F., Villa, C., Henderson, R. (1993)
Projection structure of rhodopsin.
Nature 362, 770-772.
29. Henderson, R., Baldwin, J.M., Ceska, T.A., Zemlin, F.,
Beckmann, E., Downing, K.H. (1990)
Model for the structure of bacteriorhodopsin based on high-resolution electron
cry-microscopy.
J. Mol. Biol. 213, 899-929.
30. Oliveira, L., Paiva, A.C.M., Vriend, G. (1993)
A common motif in G-protein-coupled seven transmembrane helix receptors.
J. Comp.-Aided Mol. Design 7, 649-658.
31. Baldwin, J.M. (1993)
The probable arrangement of the helices in G protein-coupled receptors.
EMBO J. 12, 1693-1703.
32. Kovàcs, T. and Ötvös, L. (1988)
Simple synthesis of 5-vinyl and 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine-5'-triphosphates.
Tetrahedron Lett. 29, 4525-4528.
33. Moffat, J.G. (1964)
A general synthesis of nucleoside-5'-triphosphates.
Can. J. Chem. 42, 599.
34. Ballesteros, J.A., Weinstein, H. (1995)
Integrated methods for the construction of three dimensional models and
computational probing of structure-function relations in G-protein
coupled receptors.
Methods Neurosci. 25, 366-428.
35. IJzerman, A.P., van Galen, P.J.M., Jacobson, K.A. (1992)
Molecular modeling of adenosine receptors.
I. The ligand binding site on the A1 receptor.
Drug Des. Discov. 9, 49-67.
36. Zhang, D., Weinstein, H. (1994)
Polarity conserved positions in transmembrane domains of G-protein coupled
receptors and bacteriorhodopsin.
FEBS Lett. 337, 207-212.
37. Sankararamakrishnan, R., Vishveshwara, S. (1992)
Geometry of proline-containing alpha-helices in proteins.
Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 39, 356-363.
38. Noel, J.P., Hamm, H.E., Sigler, P.B. (1993)
The 2.2 Å crystal structure of transducin-alpha complexed with GTPgammaS.
Nature 366, 654.
39. Brake, A. J., Wagenbach, M. J., Julius, D. (1994)
New structural motif for ligand-gated ion channels defined by an ionotropic
ATP receptor.
Nature 371, 519-523.
40. Valera, S., Hussy, N., Evans, R. J., Adami, N., North, R. A.,
Surprenant, A., Buell, G. (1994)
New class of ligand-gated ion-channel defined by P2X receptor for
extracellular ATP.
Nature 371, 516-519.
41. Erb, L., Garrad, R., Wang, Y., Quinn, T., Turner, J.T.,
Weisman, G.A. (1995)
Site-directed mutagenesis of P2U purinoceptors.
J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4185-4188.
42. von Heijne, G. and Manoil, C. (1990)
Membrane proteins: from sequence to structure.
Protein Eng. 4, 109-112.
43. Sander, C. and Schneider, R. (1991)
Database of homology-derived protein structures.
Proteins 9, 56-68.
44. Hoflack, J., Trumpp-Kallmeyer, S., Hibert, M. (1994)
Re-evaluation of bacteriorhodopsin as a model for G protein-coupled receptors.
Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 43, 348-350.
45. von Heijne, G. (1991)
Proline kinks in transmembrane alpha-helices.
J. Mol. Biol. 218, 499-503.
46. Wess, J., Gdula, D., Brann, M.R. (1991)
Site-directed mutagenesis of the m3 muscarinic receptor: identification of a
series of threonine and tyrosine residues involved in agonist but not
antagonist binding.
EMBO J. 10, 3729-3734.
47. Suryanarayana, S., Daunt, D.A., von Zastrow, M., Kobilka, B.K. (1991)
A point mutation in the seventh hydrophobic domain of the alpha2 adrenergic
receptor increases its affinity for a family of beta receptor antagonists.
J. Biol. Chem. 266, 15488-15492.
48. Oksenberg, D., Marsters, S.A., O'Dowd, B.F., Jin, H., Havlik, S.,
Peroutka, S.J., Ashkenazi, A. (1992)
A single amino-acid difference confers major pharmacological
variation between human and rodent 5-HT1B receptors.
Nature 360, 161-163.
49. Fraser, C.M., Wang, C.D., Robinson, D.A., Gocayne, J.D.,
Venter, J.C. (1989)
Site-directed mutagenesis of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors:
conserved aspartic acids play important roles in receptor function.
Mol. Pharmacol. 36, 840-847.
50. Elling, C.E., M¿ller Nielsen, S., Schwartz, T.W. (1995)
Conversion of antagonist binding site to metal-ion site in the tachykinin
NK-1 receptor.
Nature 374, 74-77.
51. Kim, J., Wess, J., van Rhee, A.M., Schöneberg, T.,
Jacobson, K.A. (1995)
Site-directed mutagenesis identifies residues involved in ligand recognition
in the human A2a adenosine receptor.
J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13987-13997.
52. Zhou, W., Flanagan, C., Ballesteros, J.A., Konvicka, K.,
Davidson, J.S., Weinstein, H., Millar, R.P., Sealfon, S.C. (1994)
A reciprocal mutation supports helix 2 and helix 7 proximity in the
gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor.
Mol. Pharmacol. 2, 165-170.
53. Horstman, D.A., Brandon, S., Wilson, A.L., Guyer, C.A.,
Cragoe, E.J., Limbird, L.E. (1990)
An aspartate conserved among G-protein receptors confers allosteric regulation
of alpha2-adrenergic receptors by sodium.
J. Biol. Chem. 265, 21590-21595.
54. IJzerman, A. P., van der Wenden, E. M., van Galen, P.J.M.,
Jacobson, K. A. (1994)
Molecular modeling of adenosine receptors - the ligand-binding site on the rat
adenosine A2a receptor.
Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect. 268, 95-104.
55. Jacobson, K.A., Fischer, B., van Rhee, A.M. (1995)
Molecular probes for muscarinic receptors: functionalized congeners of
selective muscarinic antagonists.
Life Sci. 56, 823-830.
|